Vocal cues impact dynamic credibility judgments (Peng et al., 2025)

<p dir="ltr"><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to explore how vocal cues of confidence and gender influence the dynamic mechanisms involved in reasoning about speaker credibility.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Method:</b> Using a mouse-tracking paradigm, 52 participants evaluated speaker credibility based on semantically neutral statements that varied in morphed levels of gender (Experiment 1) and confidence (Experiment 2). Participants’ mouse trajectories and reaction times were recorded to assess their credibility judgments.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Results: </b>The findings revealed that perceived confidence significantly impacted credibility judgments and mouse trajectories, while gender did not. Higher levels of perceived confidence resulted in more credible assessments, demonstrated by direct mouse trajectories and quicker reaction times. Moreover, mouse trajectories reflected cognitive mediation effects between confidence and credibility judgments, indicating that vocal cues influence both the final judgments and the dynamic inference process during speaker credibility assessment.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlights the critical role of vocal cues, particularly confidence, in shaping perceptions of speaker credibility. It suggests that these vocal cues not only affect final credibility judgments but also play a significant role in the dynamic reasoning process involved in social inference.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S</b><b>1. </b>Retaining two standard deviations or natural data of Experiment 1.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S</b><b>2. </b>The relationship between confidence, mouse trajectories, and judgments of category credibility of Experiment 1.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S3. </b>Results of Experiment 1: Mouse trajectory mediates the relationship between confidence and judgments of category credibility.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S4. </b>The influence of acoustic parameters on confidence and credible reasoning in Experiment 1.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S5. </b>Impact of individual differences on mouse trajectory in Experiment 1.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S6. </b>Credibility inference accounting for listener gender in Experiment 1.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S</b><b>7. </b>Retaining two standard deviations or natural data of Experiment 2.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S8. </b>The relationship between confidence, mouse trajectories, and judgments of category credibility of Experiment 2.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S9. </b>Results of Experiment 2: Mouse trajectory mediates the relationship between confidence and judgments of category credibility.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S10. </b>The influence of acoustic parameters on confidence and credibility inference in Experiment 2.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material S11. </b>Impact of individual differences on mouse trajectory in Experiment 2.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Supplemental Material </b><b>S12. </b>Credibility inference accounting for listener gender in Experiment 2.</p><p dir="ltr">Peng, Z., Wang, C., & Jiang, X. (2025). On how vocal cues impact dynamic credibility judgments: Mouse-tracking paradigm examining speaker confidence and gender through voice morphing. <i>Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, </i><i>68</i>(11), 5261–5277. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00849" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00849</a></p>