ASHA journals
Browse
DOCUMENT
S1_LSHSS-21-00164iuzzini-seigel.pdf (666.93 kB)
DOCUMENT
S4_LSHSS-21-00164iuzzini-seigel.pdf (520.51 kB)
DOCUMENT
S2_LSHSS-21-00164iuzzini-seigel.pdf (385.78 kB)
VIDEO
S3_LSHSS-21-00164iuzzini-seigel.mp4 (97.56 MB)
1/0
4 files

Motor speech rating tutorial (Iuzzini-Seigel et al., 2022)

online resource
posted on 2022-05-07, 00:14 authored by Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel, Kristen M. Allison, Ruth Stoeckel

Purpose: While there has been mounting research centered on the diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), little has focused on differentiating CAS from pediatric dysarthria. Because CAS and dysarthria share overlapping speech symptoms and some children have both motor speech disorders, differential diagnosis can be challenging. There is a need for clinical tools that facilitate assessment of both CAS and dysarthria symptoms in children. The goals of this tutorial are to (a) determine confidence levels of clinicians in differentially diagnosing dysarthria and CAS and (b) provide a systematic procedure for differentiating CAS and pediatric dysarthria in children.

Method: Evidence related to differential diagnosis of CAS and dysarthria is reviewed. Next, a web-based survey of 359 pediatric speech-language pathologists is used to determine clinical confidence levels in diagnosing CAS and dysarthria. Finally, a checklist of pediatric auditory–perceptual motor speech features is presented along with a procedure to identify CAS and dysarthria in children with suspected motor speech impairments. Case studies illustrate application of this protocol, and treatment implications for complex cases are discussed.

Results: The majority (60%) of clinician respondents reported low or no confidence in diagnosing dysarthria in children, and 40% reported they tend not to make this diagnosis as a result. Going forward, clinicians can use the feature checklist and protocol in this tutorial to support the differential diagnosis of CAS and dysarthria in clinical practice.

Conclusions: Incorporating this diagnostic protocol into clinical practice should help increase confidence and accuracy in diagnosing motor speech disorders in children. Future research should test the sensitivity and specificity of this protocol in a large sample of children with varying speech sound disorders. Graduate programs and continuing education trainings should provide opportunities to practice rating speech features for children with dysarthria and CAS.


Supplemental Material S1. Survey methodology, questions, flier and demographic summary of participants.


Supplemental Material S2. Auditory-perceptual feature list template and decision-making flowchart to support clinical application.


Supplemental Material S3. Video example of Case 1.


Supplemental Material S4. Additional case study descriptions, diagnoses, and treatment considerations.


Iuzzini-Seigel, J., Allison, K. M., & Stoeckel, R. (2022). A tool for differential diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech and dysarthria in children: A tutorial. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00164


Publisher Note: This article is part of the Forum: Care of the Whole Child: Key Considerations When Working With Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Funding

Funding for this work was provided by Marquette University’s Regular Research Grant, Way Klingler Young Scholar Award, and Summer Faculty Fellowship awarded to the first author.

History