Gender-related professional experiences in CSD (Jahn et al., 2025)
Purpose: The discipline of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) exhibits notable gender-related disparities despite being predominantly composed of women. Here, we explore how one’s gender identity shapes professional experiences within CSD, focusing on barriers, biases, and the lived experiences of cisgender women, cisgender men, and gender minorities.
Method: A concept mapping approach was used to gather insights from 216 professionals and trainees regarding perceived gender-related barriers within CSD. Open-ended data were condensed into 92 representative experiences, and participants rated how often they encounter each one in professional settings. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses were used to identify themes within the data and to determine how professional experiences within CSD differ as a function of gender identity and career stage.
Results: Fifteen thematic clusters emerged. Cisgender women often reported barriers linked to traditional gender roles and underrecognized qualifications. Cisgender men most often reported experiencing gender privilege. Gender minorities often highlighted obstacles that were uniquely tied to LGBTQ+ considerations and physical appearance.
Conclusion: This study highlights the need for developing educational initiatives and institutional policies that promote inclusivity and mitigate unconscious bias for professionals and trainees of all gender identities within CSD.
Supplemental Material S1. All open-ended comments from the item generation stage.
Supplemental Material S2. Rating data from professionals for all statements, stratified by gender identity.
Supplemental Material S3. Rating data from trainees (i.e., students and postdoctoral fellows) for all statements, stratified by gender identity.
Jahn, K. N., Thakkar, T., & Doak, K. R. (2025). Gender identity shapes professional experiences in communication sciences and disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 68(7), 3401–3416. https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00881
