DOCUMENT
jslhr-l-14-0266rombouts_suppfigures1.pdf (193.99 kB)
DOCUMENT
jslhr-l-14-0266rombouts_suppa.pdf (377.57 kB)
DOCUMENT
jslhr-l-14-0266rombouts_supptables5.pdf (186.83 kB)
DOCUMENT
jslhr-l-14-0266rombouts_supptables4.pdf (252.56 kB)
DOCUMENT
jslhr-l-14-0266rombouts_supptables3.pdf (252.89 kB)
DOCUMENT
jslhr-l-14-0266rombouts_supptables2.pdf (178.04 kB)
DOCUMENT
jslhr-l-14-0266rombouts_supptables1.pdf (181.19 kB)
DOCUMENT
jslhr-l-14-0266rombouts_suppfigures2.pdf (220.53 kB)
1/0
Video Feedback in Preservice Key Word Signing Training (Rombouts et al., 2016)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-01-28, 23:29 authored by Ellen Rombouts, Kristien Meuris, Bea Maes, Anne-Marie De Meyer, Inge ZinkPurpose: Research has demonstrated that formal training is essential for professionals to learn key word signing. Yet, the particular didactic strategies have not been studied. Therefore, this study compared the effectiveness of verbal and video feedback in a key word signing training for future direct support staff.
Method: Forty-nine future direct support staff were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 key word signing training programs: modeling and verbal feedback (classical method [CM]), additional video feedback (+ViF), and additional video feedback and photo reminder (+ViF/R). Signing accuracy and training acceptability were measured 1 week after and 7 months after training.
Results: Participants from the +ViF/R program achieved significantly higher signing accuracy compared with the CM group. Acceptability ratings did not differ between any of the groups.
Conclusion: Results suggest that at an equal time investment, the programs containing more training components were more effective. Research on the effect of rehearsal on signing maintenance is warranted.
