ASHA journals
Browse

Telepractice effectiveness for people with aphasia (Jewell et al., 2024)

Download (1.27 MB)
figure
posted on 2024-11-18, 15:02 authored by Courtney C. Jewell, Victoria A. Diedrichs, Deena Schwen Blackett, Alexandra Zezinka Durfee, Stacy M. Harnish

Purpose: In light of COVID-19, telepractice for speech therapy has been increasingly adopted. Telepractice promotes accessibility to therapy services for those in rural environments, lowers the frequency of missed appointments, and reduces the costs of rehabilitation. The efficacy of telepractice has been scarcely explored in the aphasia literature. Preliminary research has demonstrated comparable results of telepractice and in-person therapy for people with aphasia, but the current scope of research is insufficient to guide clinical practice. The present study examined whether the virtual administration of a picture-naming therapy paradigm was as effective as in-person administration.

Method: The treatment effects of two similar clinical trials, one completed in-person (n = 13) and one completed virtually (n = 13), are compared. Participants were adults with chronic (> 6 months) poststroke aphasia. Both clinical trials administered Cued Picture-Naming Therapy 4 days a week for 2 weeks (eight treatment sessions). Treatment outcomes were analyzed using Tau-U effect sizes and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results: Weighted Tau-U averages showed an advantage of telepractice over in-person treatment in the acquisition effects of trained words, with participants demonstrating a very large effect (0.84, p < .01) following telepractice and a large effect (0.75, p < .01) following in-person treatment. Both telepractice and in-person rehabilitation demonstrated significant treatment effects and were not significantly different from each other per Mann–Whitney U independent-samples t tests.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that telepractice of a picture-naming paradigm is as effective as in-person treatment administration. This justifies the use of telepractice to overcome accessibility and cost barriers to speech therapy administration and justifies taking patient preference into account. Future research should explore the efficacy of telepractice for treatments that promote greater generalizability to functional communication.

Supplemental Material S1. Individual participant plots.

Jewell, C. C., Diedrichs, V. A., Schwen Blackett, D., Durfee, A. Z., & Harnish, S. M. (2024). Comparative effectiveness of in-person and virtual picture-naming treatment for poststroke anomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00172

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01DC017711 (S.M.H.). The first author (C.C.J.) received support during the article review from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institute of Health under Award Number 1F31DC022142. The second author (V.A.D.) received support during article preparation from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) under Award 90ARHF0007. The NIDILRR is a center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The third author (D.S.B.) was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant T32DC014435.

History