ASHA journals
Browse
AUDIO
JSLHR_Feb13_Dilley_Child_Unmodified.wav (2.41 MB)
AUDIO
JSLHR_Feb13_Dilley_Adult_Modified.wav (2.34 MB)
AUDIO
JSLHR_Feb13_Dilley_Adult_Unmodified.wav (2.34 MB)
AUDIO
JSLHR_Feb13_Dilley_Child_Modified.wav (2.41 MB)
1/0
4 files

Sample Recording of Spontaneous Speech for Age-Related Changes to Spectral Voice Characteristics (Dilley et al., 2013)

dataset
posted on 2013-02-01, 00:00 authored by Laura C. Dilley, Elizabeth A. Wieland, Jessica L. Gamache, J. Devin McAuley, Melissa A. Redford
Purpose As children mature, changes in voice spectral characteristics co-vary with changes in speech, language, and behavior. In this study, spectral characteristics were manipulated to alter the perceived ages of talkers' voices while leaving critical acoustic–prosodic correlates intact, to determine whether perceived age differences were associated with differences in judgments of prosodic, segmental, and talker attributes.
Method Speech was modified by lowering formants and fundamental frequency, for 5-year-old children's utterances, or raising them, for adult caregivers' utterances. Next, participants differing in awareness of the manipulation (Experiment 1A) or amount of speech-language training (Experiment 1B) made judgments of prosodic, segmental, and talker attributes. Experiment 2 investigated the effects of spectral modification on intelligibility. Finally, in Experiment 3, trained analysts used formal prosody coding to assess prosodic characteristics of spectrally modified and unmodified speech.
Results Differences in perceived age were associated with differences in ratings of speech rate, fluency, intelligibility, likeability, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and speech-language disorder/delay; effects of training and awareness of the manipulation on ratings were limited. There were no significant effects of the manipulation on intelligibility or formally coded prosody judgments.
Conclusion Age-related voice characteristics can greatly affect judgments of speech and talker characteristics, raising cautionary notes for developmental research and clinical work.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant R01HD061458 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NICHD or the National Institutes of Health. We are grateful for the advice and assistance of Amanda Millett, Christine Collins, and other members of the Michigan State University Speech Laboratory.

History

Usage metrics

    Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC